Skip to main content

The Battle for Sanskrit

One would wonder why scholars, academic institutions (Columbia/Harvard) and Hindu intellectuals are involved in a high profile global battle for Sanskrit, a language spoken and written by a very small minority globally.

Rajiv Malhotra in his book 'The Battle for Sanskrit' decodes the academic 'mumbo-jumbo' of western Indologists  to reveal a well networked global ecosystem which is working hard to take charge of Sanskrit with one motive - to take charge of our Sanskriti or culture.



The modus operandi of this ecosystem super headed by Sheldon Pollock of Columbia University is very clear ..

1) Establish Sanskrit as a source of violence, oppression and a means of promoting atrocity literature. Ramayana is cited as an example of atrocity literature that encourages violence and oppression by the likes of Sheldon Pollock who claims that the caste system of India as well Hitler's concentration camps have their roots in Sanskrit. Sheldon Pollock also claims that a mere telecast of Ramayan on TV in India can cause destruction of mosques. History is twisted and presented in a very bizarre way by these American Indologists to claim the Sanskrit is the DNA of violence and oppression. 

2) Given the toxicity of Sanskrit, these Indologists want to cleanse it contain it to museums so that this 'virus of oppression' does not spread further. With this aim in mind, these Indologists are attacking the oral tradition of teaching Sanskrit. According to the likes of Sheldon Pollock anything that  is learned orally is primitive and un-scientific. Indian music is learned orally unlike western music which is read and hence is also primitive.

3) Once Sanskrit is de-toxified and confined to museums , its would be very easy to contaminate Indian sanskriti (culture) by distorting history and use it influence to political/social discourse. 

This anti Hindu ecosystem run by these American Indologists is very well entrenched in India with presence in universities, media houses, political parties, intellectuals etc. The influence of this ecosystem on the social and political discourse in India is so profound that Sheldon Pollock who calls Ramayana an atrocity literature was conferred the prestigious Padma Sri award in 2010. The Narayan Murthy foundation has pledged millions of dollars to Sheldon Pollock for translating Sanskrit texts. It is assumed that de-texofication of Sanskrit will accompany the translation.

Rajiv Malhotra does a brilliant job at exposing this anti-Sanskrit and anti-Sanskriti eco-system, its modus operandi as well its ring leader. Rajiv Malhotra has also proposed a framework to counter this eco-system. 

Rajiv Malhotra's work is a must read for anyone one who believes in Indian culture and way of life for the soul of India lies in her sanskriti. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mauka Mauka for the Enemy Within

Two things unite a nation as diverse as India - culture and cricket. When any nation takes part in a world tournament and does well very in the initial stages, one would expect the people of that nation to back the team .... Over the past few weeks we had many intellectuals and prominent media houses hoping that India looses the semi finals against Australia ... It started with noted sociologist Ashis Nandy .... According to Nandy, India is suffering from too much national pride and winning the world cup will make it worse... This was followed by a national poll by a leading print magazine Outlook which asked .. "Should India win the World Cup ? "  You can take the survey here Outlook not only echoed Nandy's sentiments but went on to add that "winning the world cup might just make India's macho and hyper masculine nationalism more intense. Over the last few months, there seems to have been an effort to make a pluralistic India into a homogeniz...

BJP Karyakarta has Won

The earliest memory I have of a BJP karyakarta was of my mother''s colleague and friend called as Rajani aunty . Rajni aunty and her family were dedicated, committed karyakartas of the RSS, Jan Sangh and then the BJP.  Their commitment was so complete that they made every contribution they could - tan, man and dhan. Even in the 1980's when the BJP was a very young party, Rajani aunty and her family stood like a steady rock. When Vajpayee lost in the 1984 election, there were tears in her eyes. Rajani aunty used to work as a professor at the Sophia college in Mumbai. Once she asked a rather innocent question in the GK paper - "Who is the founder of the RSS ? ". The secular Catholic management took a very hard view and she was forced to quit her job. For 2 years she did not have a job but never once regretted her commitment to the ideology. Through her trials , she always stood by the Sangh. Her family for generations and decades stood by the Sangh no matte...

Manohar - One who could win hearts and minds

They say that it is easy to defeat anyone, winning people over is the most difficult thing to do. Manohar Parrikar true to his name dedicated his life to winning people over. My first interaction with Manohar Parikkar was 5 years ago. Elections had been announced and Manohar Parikkar was asked to address IT professionals living in and around Outer Ring Road in Bangalore. New Horizon College was the venue. On that lazy Sunday, I managed to show up at the venue 15 before time. Politicians are known to arrive late but Manohar Parrikar was already there mingling with the IT crowd. He speech consisted of 2-3 stories with foksy humor and wisdom. He wanted the IT crowd to engage in politics, to participate in nation building, I still remember his story "Once upon a time, Goa was known for the best watermelons. Every year post the harvest season, farmers in every village would invite people to taste the best watermelons for free. There was only one condition, they had to spit ou...